|
Dear fr.freepedia.org
( person in charge)
안녕하세요?
프랑스 위키 피디아 백과사전 담당자님
→
해당 기관의 정확한 이름을 기입합니다, 항의서한
견본은 프랑스 위키 피디아 백과사전를 대상으로 하였습니다.
I
appreciate you for your valuable, and best website
먼저
훌륭하고 가치있는 최고의 웹사이트를 운영하는
당신에게 존경을 표합니다.
I
am a student and a member of VANK living in
South Korea. VANK is a non-governmental organization
and also a voluntary organization. VANK consists
of elementary, middle and high school students
who provide correct information about Korea
to international textbook publishing companies
and publishers.
저는 반크 회원으로
한국에 살고 있는 학생입니다. 반크는 비정부기구로서
외국 교과서와 출판사를 대상으로 한국에 대한
바른 정보를 전하고자 초.중.고 학생들로 구성된
자원봉사 단체입니다.
I
just want to let you know about your website
which has a serious potential problem which
may cause serious diplomatic crisis.
저는
이번에 귀사가 운영하는 웹사이트에 한국의 이미지를
심각하게 왜곡시키고 양국간 외교문제까지 발전될
수 있는 문제가 있음을 알려드리고자 합니다
We,
Korean, were quite surprised to find your website
describe Korean kingdom “Kaya” as " Mimana
" which is incorrect.
우리 한국인은
당신의 웹사이트에서 한국의 왕국인 가야를 임나라고
소개한 내용을 보고 정말 놀랬습니다
Please
refer the following in your website
당신
사이트의 다음 부분을 참고해주세요
http://fr.freepedia.org/369.html
→
해당 사이트별로 임나일본부설을 서술한 주소를
기입합니다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Un
corps expeditionnaire japonais prend pied en
Coree du Sud et etablit la colonie de Mimana.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
→
해당 사이트에 임나일본부설을 서술한 내용을 기입합니다
Korean
kingdom "Kaya" was founded by ancient
Korean not Japanese. And Kaya definitely wasn’t
colony of Japan.
한국의 왕국 가야는
분명히 일본인이 아니라 고대 한국인이 세운 왕국입니다.
또한 가야는 확실하게 일본의 식민지가 아니였습니다.
Let
me explain about a historical perspective, why
your description about Kaya is wrong.
지금부터
역사학적인 관점에서 왜 가야에 대한 서술이 잘못되어
있는지를 설명드리겠습니다.
↓ 지금부터는 역사학적으로 임나일본부설이
왜 잘못된 것인지를 설명합니다.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The argument that
ancient Japan ruled the southern region of Korea (the ancient Japanese military
outpost, Mimana (369~562), is a story trumped up by the Japanese imperialists
during the late 19th century while Japan legitimizing its occupation of
Korea.
According to this story, ancient Silla and Baekje sent tribute to Japan’s Yamato
Administration. Then, the Yamato Administration invaded the southeastern region
of the Korean Peninsula in about 369 and established a Japanese military outpost
in the Gaya region. The Yamato Administration is said to have colonized and
ruled this area for about 200 years until 562. However, there are serious flaws
in this interpretation of history.
First Korean scholars believe that the
Nihon Seogi,(日本書紀), on which Japanese scholars base the Japanese outpost
idea was authored by Baekje exiles or their descendants. Because of this, it is
very possible that the author(s), who were exiled from a ruined kingdom (Baekje)
embellished their story to favor Japan or to enhance the prestige of Japan’s
rulers. Other evidence that the records in the Nihon Seogi are not true
is found in the Kojiki, which was written eight years before the Nihon
Seogi. The Kojiki does not contain any record of any Japanese military
outpost in Korea.
Second, considering the power structure of East Asia,
Japan was not capable of advancing onto the Korean Peninsula from the fourth to
the sixth century. At that time, no unified nation existed in Japan.
Furthermore, Japan did not have the shipbuilding skills to build ships to carry
out a large-scale military operation overseas. In other words, China was the
most powerful country followed by Korea. Japan was very weak at that time.
Third, assuming, for argument sake, that a Japanese military outpost had indeed
existed in Korea, it would then be natural to assume that ruins or artifacts
remaining from that era would remain. For example, artifacts from Goguryeo’s
King Gwanggaeto, were discovered in Gyeongju. Gyeongju was the capital of Silla,
but Goguryeo had control over Silla at that time. Contrary to this, not a single
artifact indicating Japan’s supposed presence in Korea has been found in the
region even though Japan allegedly ruled the region for about 200 years. This is
another piece of evidence suggesting that Japan’s allegation that it had
colonized the southeastern part of Korea is false.
Fourth, from the end
of the fourth century, many Baekje people emigrated to Japan. During their
journey to Japan, Baekje people stayed in the Gaya region. A commercial house
was established for those staying in Gaya at that time, and Japan may have
distorted this commercial house into the Japanese military outpost.
No
one denies that Japanese pirated from the western part of Japan invaded and
looted the southeastern shores of the Korean Peninsula, and because of this,
there were military confrontations between the ancient kingdoms of Korea and the
Japanese pirates. However, it is a great distortion of history to argue that
Japan conquered the southern region of the Korean Peninsula and ruled the region
for a long time through its military outpost.
The
question of whether there was a Japanese military outpost is the subject of
intense debate between Korea and Japan in regard to ancient relations between
the two counties. Korean scholars continue to argue and have provide proof that
the Japanese military outpost idea is a fabrication of the Japanese
colonialists. Any reference to this should therefore be stricken from the
textbooks and reference materials of other countries.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
↑ 역사학적으로 임나일본부설이 왜 잘못된
것인지 설명하는 부분을 여기서 끝냅니다.
So, as a member of VANK, I urge you to delete
Mimana(Kaya) and wrong descriptions about Kaya(Gaya)
in all your documents and website.
그래서 반크 회원의 한사람으로서 저는 당신의
기관에서 사용하는 모든 출판물과 웹사이트에서
"임나" 라는 표현과 가야에 대한 잘못된
서술내용을 삭제할 것을 요구합니다
We would be grateful for your explanation.
여기에 대한 당신의 입장을 들을 수 있기를
바랍니다.
Yours very truly,
VANK, Cyber Civilian Diplomat in Korea, consisted
of 10,000 Korean voluntary people.
사이버 외교사절단 반크
http://www.prkorea.org mailto:
eastsea@prkorea.org
Thank you, and we would appreciate your favorable
consideration.
"Though it is the smallest of all your
seeds, yet when it grows, it is the largest
of garden plants and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and
perch in its branches." - [Matthew] -
→ 상대 기관에 대해 답변이 올 경우 반크 에서
후속조치가 가능하도록 반크에 대한 단체 설명을
합니다
VANK stands for - ‘Voluntary Agency Network
of Korea’, a civilian international exchange
association in Korea. We work for the promotion of Korea's image all over the world
by Internet. VANK was established in 1999 by
volunteers, and now has over 12,000 members. Using email or internet we serve
as cyber travel guides to overseas Koreans and
foreigners so that they can understand Korean culture and language better, and at
the same time we hope we build international
friendships. VANK is a great chance for those who are interested in Korean language,
arts, cultural education, history, geography,
social studies, sciences to learn about our
country, and we also welcome with open arms
anyone just wanting to make Korean friends!
(1) reference
1) The Fallacy of a Japanese Outpost on the
South Coast.
http://www.prkorea.com/english/textbook/history05.html
3)Truth in scholarship
http://www.prkorea.com/english/textbook/maintruth.html
→ 임나일본부설에 대한 이해를 높일 수 있는
한국 학자들의 자세한 배경 자료와 관련 운동에
대한 외국 유명 기관의 입장을 소개합니다.
|
